Reddit roundup: should independent sites review the tech claims of campaigns?
Product Quality · PledgeRadar Editorial ·
In 2013, u/ch00f and a friend launched a blog reviewing the technical feasibility of Kickstarter hardware claims. Commenters debated what makes such reviews credible and useful.
What Reddit users said
Felt one article read more like personal opinion than a technical review, and urged readers to judge for themselves.
Original commentSuggested a clear likelihood score, from 'unlikely' to 'likely with minor or no delays'.
Original commentDone right, it helps people ask the right questions and prevents outright fraud; suggested going beyond tech projects.
Original commentInformed consumers help the credibility of crowdfunding as a whole.
Original commentAsked whether the reviews cover the projects or Kickstarter itself.
Original commentSource: My friend and I made a blog where we review the technical aspects of Kickstarters and investigate if their claims are misleading or unfeasible. (r/kickstarter)
Replies in this roundup summarize public comments posted on Reddit and are credited to their original authors, with links to the source. They are third-party opinions, not statements by PledgeRadar or its members. PledgeRadar does not verify these claims and accepts no legal responsibility for the content of community discussions.